Perhaps the old adage is true that you get what you pay for, but it sure would be nice if people could pay for what they got.
By Kimberly Lew (Playwright/Blogger)
One of my favorite websites, Humans of New York, made headlines last week. Unfortunately, it was less about the beautiful moments that photographer Brandon Stanton captures and instead about how DKNY used his photos in a window display in China, despite the fact that Brandon had declined their offer to use his photography in their marketing. It was a clear infringement on his intellectual property, and Brandon turned lemons into lemonade by simply asking for a donation to a Brooklyn YMCA and raising over $100,000 for the organization through his followers alone.

The lines with the Humans of New York incident seem, at least on the surface, somewhat black and white. A big corporation vs. a single person. A philanthropic request put forth over litigation for personal financial gain. Legally, there are still a lot of grey areas, but in this case, it wasn't hard to side with Brandon in trying to stand up to The Man, demanding credit where credit is due, and attempting to turn a bad situation into a positive one for the community.
But the truth is that compensating artists for their work has always been an uphill battle. Sometimes it's a struggle with a major publication to get payment for a contribution. But it's not just big corporations that don't pay for content. Sometimes it's a small, struggling theatre group or a bunch of students-- most times, it's the people who the artists connect with and want to reach most.
The internet is a fantastic invention because it allows unknown artists to find an instant platform. Naturally, there is a lot more competition, but in the age of Bieber, the internet allows everyone the chance to have their voices heard and to connect with potential fans and followers. The big problem for artists (particularly ones who get their start on the web) is conversion. Just because people 'Follow' and 'View' and 'Like,' doesn't necessarily mean people will be willing to pay when that content is not free. While there can be great debate about what is worthy of money and what should be art for art's sake, the bottom line is that if an artist is not able to sustain him/herself, making that art becomes harder, if not impossible.